Analysis of Chemistry History of “Frog Leg Debate” and Its Teaching Value
SHAN Yuan-Yuan1, ZHENG Chang-Long2*
1. Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China;
2. Institute of Chemistry Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
Pera, Marcello. The ambiguous frog: the Galvani-Volta controversy on animal electricity. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1992
[2]
Johnson, George. The ten most beautiful experiments. New York,N Y:Vintage Books, 2008:62-75
[3]
Matthews M R. Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge,1994:11-28
[4]
武盼盼, 刘子忠,张凤英.化学教育(中英文),2017,38(17):34-42
[5]
于建军. 中学化学史教育教学现状及问题研究.长春:东北师范大学硕士学位论文,2008:29
[6]
Galvani, Luigi. Bologna: Tip. Istituto delle Scienze,1791 (7):363-418
[7]
Volta A. “On the electricity excited by the mere contact of conducting substances of different kinds[J]. In a letter from Mr. Alexander Volta, FRS Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Pavia, to the Rt. Hon. Sir Joseph Banks, Bart. KBPR S.” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London.1800 (90): 403-431
[8]
Galvani, Luigi. Dell’uso e dell'attività dell'arco conduttore nelle contrazioni dei muscoli. Bologna: A S. Tommaso d'Aquino, 1794
[9]
Piccolino, Marco. Brain research bulletin, 1998 (5): 381-407
[10]
Aldini, Giovanni. De animali electricitate dissertationes duae. Bonomiae:Typographia Instituti Scientiarum, 1794:14