基于科学论证视角的职前科学教师培养研究述评

doi:10.13884/j.1003-3807hxjy.2019090032

摘要
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (887 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

摘要：目前基于科学论证的教学设计研究成果缺乏,且科学教师论证水平普遍较低,且未养成习惯。通过文献法,关注国际本主题相关实证研究成果,发现职前科学教师对科学论证具有不同的理解,科学论证对职前科学教师科学本质观、科学概念和论证能力有影响。基于文献总结,从培养论证能力的专业课程设置、社会性科学议题教学和学科知识强化等3个方面提出建议。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈凯
	林佳依
	王坤

关键词： 科学论证, 职前科学教师, 教师教育, 论证能力, 论证意识

基金资助:2018年南京晓庄学院校级科研高层次培育项目“科学教师专业成长的数据挖掘及相关决策研究”(2018NXY17);国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2018年度教育学一般课题“乡村教师的文化境域及改善研究”(BHA180148)

通讯作者: ** E-mail: zhenjiangchenkai@126.com

引用本文:

陈凯, 林佳依, 王坤. 基于科学论证视角的职前科学教师培养研究述评[J]. 化学教育（中英文）, 2020, 41(18): 61-68

[1]	高超.课程教育研究, 2015(28):6
[2]	刘兴然.外国教育研究, 2014(5):115-122
[3]	Reiser B J,Berland L K, Kenyon L,等.中国科技教育, 2012(9):34-39
[4]	中华人民共和国教育部.普通高中化学课程标准(2017年版). 北京:人民教育出版社, 2018:3
[5]	Sampson V, Blanchard M R. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49(9): 1122-1148
[6]	Aydeniz M, Ozdilek Z. Science Education International, 2015, 26(2):217-239
[7]	Martíngámez C, Erduran S. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2018(1):1-21
[8]	Xie Q, So W W M. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2012, 13(2):1-20
[9]	陈昕昕.职前化学教师论证教学能力培养的实践研究.新乡:河南师范大学硕士学位论文,2017:45
[10]	李少勤.化学师范生科学论争能力的现状探究.上海:上海师范大学硕士学位论文, 2013:51
[11]	高超.职前化学教师科学论证能力发展研究.临汾:山西师范大学硕士学位论文,2016:65
[12]	罗秀玲,肖信,陈欢.化学教育,2016,37(16):43-47
[13]	李莉.职前物理教师论证能力的调查与分析.南京:南京师范大学硕士学位论文,2017:34-35
[14]	冯思宇.论证视角下初中新手—熟手物理教师课堂话语的研究.上海:华东师范大学硕士学位论文,2017:50-51
[15]	董泽华.新手型科学教师课堂话语分析——以“论证”和“非论证”的角度.上海:华东师范大学硕士学位论文, 2016:43-45
[16]	Mcneill K L, Knight A M. Science Education, 2013, 97(6):936-972
[17]	Foonga C C, Daniela E G S. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, 9:1198-1207
[18]	Sadler T D, Fowler S R. Science Education, 2006, 90(6):986-1004
[19]	Herawati D, Ardianto D. Socioscientific Argumentation of Pre-Service Teachers about Genetically Modified Organisms[EB/OL]. (2017-09-18)[2019-10-14] . https://iopscience_iop.gg363.site/article/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012023/pdf
[20]	Donnelly L A. International Journal of Science Education, 2006, 28(12):1463-1488
[21]	Cetin P S, Dogan N, Kutluca A Y. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2014, 25(3):309-331
[22]	Archila P A. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2014, 15(1):1-21
[23]	Koosimile A T, Suping S M. International Journal of Educational Development, 2011, 31(5): 458-464
[24]	Mcneill K L, Knight A M. Science Education, 2013, 97(6):936-972
[25]	Aydeniz M, Ozdilek Z. Science Education International, 2015, 26(2):217-239
[26]	Namdar B. International Journal of Progressive Education, 2017, 13(3):95-111
[27]	Lambert J L, Bleicher R E. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science & Technology, 2016, 5(1):101
[28]	Ghebru S, Ogunniyi M. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 2017, 21(1):1-12
[29]	Cetn P S, Erduran S, Kaya E. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 2010, 11(4):41-59
[30]	Mcdonald C V. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010, 47(9):1137-1164
[31]	Boran G H, Bag H. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2016, 11(6):1423-1431
[32]	Kutluca A Y, Aydn A. Science & Education, 2017, 26(7):1-32
[33]	Daskolia M, Flogaitis E, Papageorgiou E. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2006, 15(2):168-178
[34]	Sampson V, Blanchard M R. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2012, 49(9): 1122-1148
[35]	Ebru K. International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35(7):1139-1158
[36]	Aydeniz M, Dogan A. Chemistry Education Research & Practice, 2016, 17(1):111-119
[37]	Cetin P S. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2014, 32(1):1-20
[38]	DemircioAgˇlu T, Uar S. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 46:5035-5039
[39]	Iordanou K, Constantinou C P. Learning and Instruction, 2014, 34: 42-57
[40]	Cigdemoglu C, Arslan H O, Cam A. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2017, 18(2): 288-303
[41]	Hand B, Nam J, Choi A. Educación Química, 2012, 23:96-100
[42]	Sampson V, Walker J P. International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34(10):1443-1485
[43]	Ozdem Y, Ertepinar H, Cakiroglu J. International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35(15):2559-2586
[44]	Robertshaw B, Campbell T. Science Education International, 2013, 24:195-211
[45]	Cebrián-Robles D, Franco-Mariscal A J. Instructional Science, 2018(3):1-29
[46]	Adúriz-Bravo A, Bonan L, Galli L G. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2005, 1(1): 76-83
[47]	Lancaster G, Cooper R. Investigation of a reflective pedagogy to encourage pre-service physics teachers to explore argumentation as an aid to conceptual understanding[EB/OL].(2014-12-07)[2019-10-14] .https://researchmgt.monash.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/52168478/26996699_oa.pdf
[48]	Gilles B D. Preservice teachers’ discursive approaches to constructing scientific arguments from evidence to claim. USA: Indiana University, 2017
[49]	Lambert J L, Bleicher R E, Soden B J. Using Scientific Argumentation in a Science Methods Course to Improve Preservice Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change[EB/OL].(2014-12-07)[2019-10-14]. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AGUFMED33A3501L
[50]	Cavagnetto A R. Review of Educational Research, 2010, 80(3): 336-371
[51]	Nam Y, Chen Y C. Pre-service science teachers’ argumentation about a socio-scientific issue through an inquiry activity using a physical model[EB/OL].(2014-07-07)[2019-10-14] .https://library.iated.org/view/NAM2014PRE
[52]	Kutluca A Y, Aydin A. Science Education International, 2016,27(3):320-343
[53]	Lambert J L, Bleicher R E. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 2017, 5(1):101
[54]	Iordanou K, Constantinou C P. Learning & Instruction, 2014, 34:42-57
[55]	Jiménez-Aleixandre M P, Brocos P. Processes of Negotiation in Socio-scientific Argumentation About Vegetarianism in Teacher Education. Berlin: Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, 2017: 117-139
[56]	韩葵葵.中学生的科学论证能力——结构、测评、发展及培养.西安:陕西师范大学博士学位论文, 2016:167-168
[57]	Cinici A. International Journal of Science Education, 2016, 38(11):1-26