化学·生活·社会
|
火场土壤中残留助燃剂检验鉴定研究进展*
梁鲁嘉1 , 金静2** , 刘玲2 , 钱佩雯1**
1.中国人民警察大学研究生院 河北廊坊 065000; 2.中国人民警察大学侦查学院 河北廊坊 065000
Research Progress on Identification of Accelerant in Soil for Fire Investigation
LIANG Lu-Jia1 , JIN Jing2** , LIU Ling2 , QIAN Pei-Wen1
1. Graduate Department, China People's Police University, Langfang 065000, China; 2. School of Criminal Investigation, China People's Police University, Langfang 065000, China
摘要: 火场燃烧残留物物证的识别和检验鉴定对认定火灾性质有重要作用,其中土壤类物证是火场中一种重要的检材类型,土壤作为典型的渗透性介质,渗入其中的助燃剂虽不易发生燃烧,但火场环境复杂,土壤中助燃剂残留物物证检验鉴定不可避免地受到风化、微生物效应等因素干扰。为了解土壤中助燃剂残留物物证鉴定领域的研究进展,对近年来的相关研究进行了梳理,主要包括土壤中助燃剂残留物物证火场提取位置及鉴定,干扰因素如微生物效应、风化效应以及2者耦合对助燃剂物证的影响,微生物效应的抑制等研究,并对今后的研究方向进行了展望,旨在为土壤中助燃剂残留物物证鉴定提供参考。
关键词: 火灾调查 ,
土壤 ,
助燃剂 ,
鉴定 ,
干扰
基金资助: *公安部技术研究计划“助燃剂放火现场特征研究”(2020JSYJC24);河北省自然科学基金资助项目“基于化学结构关联的丁苯共聚物对火场汽油检验鉴定强干扰机理研究”(E2021507001)
通讯作者:
** E-mail: huodiaoxueshu@163.com
引用本文:
梁鲁嘉, 金静, 刘玲, 钱佩雯. 火场土壤中残留助燃剂检验鉴定研究进展* [J]. 化学教育(中英文), 2024, 45(2): 13-17
[1]
应急消防救援局.2021年消防接处警创新高,扑救火灾74.5万起[EB/OL].(2022-02-10)[2022-07-13].https://www.119.gov.cn/article/46TiYamnnrs
[2]
James M. Arson Incident Report(AIR). United States Bomb Data Center, 2020
[3]
Conner L, Chin S, Furton K G. Sensors & Actuators B Chemical, 2006, 116(1/2):121-129
[4]
Cheenmatchaya A, Kungwankunakorn S. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2018, 50(1):110-121
[5]
Icove D J, Haynes G A, Kirk's fire investigation. 8th ed. Pearson: New Jersey, 2018:267-268
[6]
Cheenmatchaya A, Kungwankunakorn S. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev., 2014, 5(2):171-175
[7]
ASTM E 1618—19. Standard Test Method for Ignitable Liquid Residues in Extracts from Fire Debris Samples by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
[8]
苗原,刘啸林,王敏,等.河南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2021(6):19-23
[9]
Turner D A, Goodpaster J V. Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2009, 394(1):363-371
[10]
Turner D A, Goodpaster J V. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 56(4):984-987
[11]
Chalmers D, Yan S X, Cassista A, et al. Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, 2001, 34(2):49-62
[12]
程芳彬.塑料对汽油燃烧残留物鉴定的干扰研究.北京:中国人民公安大学博士学位论文,2019
[13]
Turner D A, Pichtel J, Rodenas Y, et al. Forensic Science International, 2015, 251:69-76
[14]
Turner D A, Goodpaster J V. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2013, 405(5):1593-1599
[15]
Turner D A, Pichtel J, Rodenas Y, et al. Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 2014, 5(2):1-7
[16]
Tverdovsky A. Microbial biodegradation of various classes of ignitable liquids in forensic soil samples. Boston: Boston University,2013:58
[17]
Mann D C, Gresham W R. Journal of Foren Sciences, 1990, 35(4):913-923
[18]
Kindell J H, Williams M R, Sigman M E. Forensic Chemistry, 2017, 6:19-27
[19]
方强,刘玲. 色谱,2019,37(6):655-660
[20]
姜勇,诸葛玉平,梁超,等.土壤通报,2003(1):65-69
[21]
Bauhus J, Khanna P K, Raison R J. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1993, 31(5):621-639
[22]
Johannes R, Philip C B, Erland B. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42(6):926-934
[23]
Turner D A, Goodpaster J V. Forensic Science International, 2014, 239:86-91
[24]
方强,刘玲.消防科学与技术, 2020,39(1):21-24
[25]
Hutshes K, Hoult J. Forensic Chemistry, 2018,8:95-103
[26]
朱欣洁,孙先锋,杨波波. 山东化工,2015,44(11):160-162
[27]
殷果,钱佩雯,李秋璠梓,等. 色谱,2022,40(5):401-408
[28]
李盈宇,梁栋,沈浩. 中山大学学报:自然科学版,2013,52(5):107-110
[29]
李秋璠梓,金静,邓亮,等. 消防科学与技术,2021,40(4):590-594
[30]
刘烁彤,包喜杰,刘玲.消防科学与技术,2019, 38(2):207-210
[31]
Waddell E E, Williams M R, Sigman M E. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2014, 59(4):927-35
[32]
姜华,徐明华,刘明辉,等.分析测试学报,2007(S1):344-346
[33]
Turner D A, Goodpaster J V. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 57(1):64-69
[34]
Turner D A, Williams M, Sigman M A, et al. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2018, 63(2):58-65
[35]
Kindell J H, Williams M R, Sigman M E. Forensic Chemistry, 2017,6:1-52