课程·教材·评价
化学概念理解水平的确定与测查研究——以酸碱反应概念理解测查工具的开发为例
毕华林1 , 郑晓莹2 , 卢姗姗1
1. 山东师范大学化学化工与材料科学学院 山东济南 250014;
Determination and Test of Understanding Level of Chemical Concepts: Test Tool Development for Conceptual Understanding of Acid-Base Reaction
BI Hua-Lin1 , ZHENG Xiao-Ying2 , LU Shan-Shan1
1. College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan 250014, China;
摘要： 为测量学生酸碱反应概念的理解水平，并诊断学生的相异构想，基于RASCH模型开发了酸碱反应概念理解的测查工具。使用该测查工具对752名高中生进行测试，分析显示测试结果有一定的信度和效度。研究还表明，中学生对酸碱反应概念的理解水平随年级升高而提高，但在不同的理解水平上学生均存在较多的相异构想。
关键词： 概念理解 ,
酸碱反应 ,
相异构想 ,
测查工具
基金资助: 山东省社科规划项目“基于学科核心素养的学习评价研究（16CJYJ11）”.
通讯作者:
毕华林
E-mail: bihualin@sdnu.edu.cn
引用本文:
毕华林, 郑晓莹, 卢姗姗. 化学概念理解水平的确定与测查研究——以酸碱反应概念理解测查工具的开发为例[J]. 化学教育（中英文）, 2018, 39(9): 54-61
[1]
Johnstone A H, Macdonald J J, Webb G. Physics Education, 1977, 12(4):248-251
[2]
Driver R, Easley J. Studies in Science Education, 1978, 5(1):61-84
[3]
Ausubel D P.Educational psychology:a cognitive view. New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968:50-51
[4]
McClary L M, Bretz S L. International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34(15):2317-2341
[5]
Caleon I S, Subramaniam R. Research in Science Education, 2010, 40(3):313-337
[6]
Treagust D F. International Journal of Science Education, 1988, 10(2):159-169
[7]
Tan K C D, Goh N K, Chia L S, et al. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2002,39(4):283-301
[8]
Chandrasegaran A L, Treagust D F, Mocerino M. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2007, 8(3):293-307
[9]
Mintzes J J, Wandersee J H, Novak J D. Assessing Science Understanding:a human constructivist view. San Diego, California:Elsevier Academic Press, 1999:355-373
[10]
Aktan D C. European Journal of Physics, 2012, 34(1):33-43
[11]
Wilson M. Journal of Psychology, 2008, 216(2):74-88
[12]
Liu X. Science Education, 2010, 96(1):183-185
[13]
Schmidt H J. International Journal of Science Education, 1991, 13(4):459-472
[14]
Liu X. Second international handbook of science education. Springer Netherlands, 2012:651-665
[15]
Barke H D, Hazari A, Yitbarek S. Misconceptions in chemistry. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2009:173-206
[16]
Chiu M H. International Journal of Science Education, 2007, 29(4):421-452
[17]
Hoe K Y, Subramaniam R. Chemistry Education Research & Practice, 2015, 17(2):263-282
[18]
Ross H B, Munby H. International Journal of Science Education, 1991, 13(1):11-23
[19]
Johnstone A H. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1991, 7(2):75-83
[20]
Ainsworth S. Computers & Education, 1999,33(2):131-152
[21]
Adadan E, Savasci F. International Journal of Science Education, 2012,34(4):513-544
[22]
Liu X, Boone W. Application of Rasch Measurement in Science Education. Maple Grove:JAM Press, 2006:1-19
[23]
Linacre J M. A user's guide to WINSTEPS:Rasch model computer programs. Chicago:MESA Press, 2011:20
[24]
卢姗姗,毕华林.化学教育,2013,34(12):36-40
[25]
卢姗姗,毕华林.化学教育,2016,37(21):29-35
